Rohit Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47257 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2022 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
Rohit Das S/o Ajay Das R/o village Bichkodwa, P.S. Chakai, District Jamui. 2.
Ajay Das S/o Jagarnath Das R/o village Bichkodwa, P.S. Chakai, District Jamui.
3.
Debu Das S/o Tipan Das R/o village Bichkodwa, P.S. Chakai, District Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application in respect of petitioners no.2 and 3, namely, Ajay Das and Debu Das as they have already been apprehended by the police during pendency of this application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioners no.2 and 3, namely, Ajay Das and Debu Das are concerned.
Heard both sides.
Petitioner No.1, namely, Rohit Das apprehends his arrest in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No.110 of 2022,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47257 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 2/3 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner No.1, Rohit Das is said to have entered into the shop of one Lalan and assaulted his wife on her hand by means of rod.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that both the parties are on inimical terms with each other and simply to harass the petitioner, the informant has lodged the instant case with baseless allegation. It is submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries. The injuries are simple in nature.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner no.1, namely, Rohit Das, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47257 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 3/3 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No.110 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T