Kundan Yadav @ Kundan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56854 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2021 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== KUNDAN YADAV @ KUNDAN KUMAR YADAV SON OF RATAN YADAV Resident of Village - Daulatpur, P.S.- Jamui, Distt.- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikramdeo Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 307, 323, 324, 341 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, while the informant was standing at his door, it is stated that the accused persons including the petitioner came there variously armed. The petitioner struck the informant with an iron rod on his head while co-accused Bablu Yadav struck with a tangi. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties. There is no repetition of blow. The petitioner is in custody since 30.7.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56854 of 2021(3) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 Heard learned APP for the State.

From perusal of the materials on record it transpires that the doctor has found two injuries on the parietal region of the informant and the X-ray showed hair line fracture on the skull bone which has been opined to be grievous in nature. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner together with the nature of injury, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U