Shiv Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10773 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Shiv Kumar Sahni Son of Niranjan Sahni, Resident of Village-Kataiya, P.S.- Bisfi, District-Madhubani.
2.
Shatrudhan Sahni Son of Late Ganesh Sahni, Resident of Village-Kataiya, P.S.-Bisfi, District-Madhubani.
3.
Usha Devi, Wife of Lalit Sahani, Resident of Village-Kataiya, P.S.-Bisfi, District-Madhubani.
4.
Vibha Devi, Wife of Pappu Sahani, Resident of Village-Kataiya, P.S.-Bisfi, District-Madhubani.
5.
Rampari Devi, Wife of Parshuram Sahni, Resident of Village-Bhalbhinda, Police Station-Bisfi, District-Madhubani.
6.
Anaria Devi, Wife of Bittu Sahni, Resident of Village and P.O.-Janipur, Police Station-Bisfi, District-Madhubani.
7.
Arjun Sahni, son of Late Rajendra Sahni, Resident of Village and P.O.- Nahas, Police Station-Bisfi, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The Minister, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar. 3.
The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.
5.
The District Co-operative Officer, Madhubani. 6.
Bisfi Block Fisherman Co-operative Society Ltd. through its Secretary namely Smt. Sulekha Kumari Resident of Village-Ajnouli, Police StationBisfi, District-Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, AC to GA-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2024 Heard Ms. Mahasweta Chatterjee, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, learned AC to GA-13 appearing on behalf of the State.
2. Ms. Mahasweta Chatterjee, learned counsel
Patna High Court CWJC No.10773 of 2023(2) dt.23-01-2024 2/2 appearing on behalf of the petitioners informed this Court that the present case has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the present writ application stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Purnendu Singh, J.) Ashishsingh/- U