Sunita Upadhayay v. The Union Bank Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12152 of 2012 ====================================================== Sunita Upadhayay, Wife of Umesh Kumar , Resident of Village- Akhata, Bajpayaeeble, Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union Bank of India through its Chairman, Mumbai

2. The Chairman, Union Bank of India, Mumbai

3. Zonal Manager, Union Bank of India, Kolkata

4. Chief Manager, Union Bank of India, Patna

5. Nodal Regional Officer-Cum-Authorised Person, Union Bank of India, Naseman Bhawan Mahazarul Haque Path (Fraser Road) Patna- 01

6. Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Sitamarhi Branch Rajopatty, Sitamarhi .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nilu Agrawal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2016 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice of Public Sale-cum-auction issued under the signature of respondent no.5 (Annexure-3).

2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents makes statement at the bar that the matter has since been settled and the petitioner has liquidated the loan account which has since been closed. It is, therefore, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. Having regard to the aforesaid statement on

Patna High Court CWJC No.12152 of 2012 (3) dt.28-06-2016 2/2 behalf of he respondents, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Vikash Jain, J) N.H./- U