← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/5511/2013disposed

Vashistha Narain Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-13Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5511 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16307 of 2009 =========================================================== Vashistha Narain Tripathi, Son of Late Brahmdeo Tripathy, Resident of Village Haraji, P.S. Awatar Nagar, District Saran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shri Ramchandra Jha, Vice-Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University.

3. Sudhir Kumar Choudhary, Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University.

4. Shri Ram Sundar Das, President, Governing Body of Brahmdeo Muni Udasin Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Hajipur (Vaishali).

5. Ajit Kishore Narain, Secretary, Governing Body of Brahmdeo Muni Udasin Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya Hajipur (Vaishali).

6. Sh. Jai Kishore Pandey, the Incharge Principal of Brahmdeo Muni Udasin Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya Hajipur (Vaishali).

.... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nirbhay K. Singh, G.P.26 For the University :

Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-07-2016 The unqualified apology is accepted on behalf of the contemnors only on the ground that they give a categorical assurance and undertaking to the Court that in future all judicial orders will be carried out in letter and spirit including the time frame which may be indicated therein. There are some explanations offered which are not required to be gone into in detail but the Vice-Chancellor and the Registrar including all the functionaries of the University should not give an impression that they are not amenable to law and the

Patna High Court MJC No.5511 of 2013 dt.13-07-2016 2 / 2 directives of Courts.

Contempt application stands disposed of.

Personal presence of opposite parties is also dispensed with.

If the petitioner finds any congruity in the calculation of payment so made which are bona fide and legal, he has freedom to bring it to the notice of the Registrar of the University who has the duty to verify the authenticity of such grievance. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.07.2016 Transmission Date