← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7797/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

M/S D. M. Tiwary And Partners v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-04-09Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7797 of 2016 ====================================================== M/s D. M. Tiwary And Partners Son of Late Sheo Murti Tiwary, Resident of Mohalla - Shivaji Nagar, Khajanchi Halt, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Irrigation Building, Government of Bihar, Patn 3.

Engineer - in - Chief North Bihar, Department of water Resources, Irrigation Building, Harding Roa 4.

The Chief Engineer, Irrigation Department, Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga. 5.

The Superintending Engineer, West Koshi Canal Circle, Birpur, District- Saharsa. 6.

The Executive Engineer Panning and Monitoring Division No. 1, Water Resources Department, Irrigati 7.

The Executive Engineer, Western Koshi Canal Division No. 1, Kanhauli, District - Supaul.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Nandan Prasad- Sc9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The matter is coming for hearing on 13.09.2023, on the said day there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and it was directed to list this matter on 05.10.2023, but the matter was listed on 15.03.2024. On the said day also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and, therefore, as a last indulgence for hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was to be posted on 18.03.2024.

Patna High Court CWJC No. 7797 of 2016(6) dt.09-04-2024 2/2

3. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court is of the considerable view that the petitioner has no interest to evince with the matter.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for default.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) manishkumar/- U