← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2504/2019disposed

Mahesh Choubey v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-01Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2504 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19486 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Choubey son of Late Sheo Nandan Choubey at present residing at Quarter no. 15 (old), Patna High School Campus, at and P.S. - Gardanibagh, Town and District - Patna.

2.

Suniti Kumar son of Sri Sudhansu Kumar resident of VillageMachhanahata, P.S. Durgabati, District- Kaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department (Now Education Department), Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Shushil Kumar, the Director (Administration), Human Resources Development Department (Now Education Department), Bihar, Patna. 3.

Sri Girwar Dayal Singh, the Director (Secondary Education), Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Tewari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2023 Heard the parties.

The present petition has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 26.09.2018 read with 31.10.2018 passed in CWJC No. 19486 of 2014.

Learned State Counsel has straightaway taken this Court to the order passed by the Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna communicated to the petitioners vide memo no. 1810 dated 23.09.2019 by which the claim of the petitioners has been rejected (Annexure B to the show cause on behalf of the

Patna High Court MJC No.2504 of 2019(2) dt.01-08-2023 2/2 opposite party nos. 1 to 3).

It is the case of the petitioners that the opposite parties are deliberately discriminating him and while allowing the case of others, his case has been rejected.

The petitioners are well advised to challenge the order in Writ Court.

The MJC No. 2504 of 2019 stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U