Mira Sinha @ Mira Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police (D.G.P.) Bihar, Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1085 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29346 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Mira Sinha @ Mira Kumari, W/O Anand Kumar Sinha, R/O Village-Fatehpur, P.S-Belchi, District-Patna, At Present Posted As A.N.M., P.M.C.H., P.SPirbahore, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Director General Of Police (D.G.P.) Bihar, Patna 2.
The Senior Superintendent Of Police (S.S.P.), Patna. 3.
The Deputy Superintendent Of Police (DY.S.P.) Secretariat, Patna. 4.
Station House Officer (SHO), Shastri Nagar P.S., Patna. 5.
Amit Kumar, S/O Ramjee Choudhary, R/O Bank Of India Colony B/21, P.SShastri Nagar, P.O-B.V. College, Pin Code-800014, District-Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anurag Pandey, Advocate.
Mr. Rajesh Prasad, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking direction to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, the State Police Officers, to execute the process issued against the Respondent No. 5 to arrest him.
2. Apparently, the present writ petition is misconceived.
3. In case of non-execution of the Process issued by any court, it is for the court which has issued the process to take steps to ensure that the Authorities which are duty bound to
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1085 of 2021(7) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 execute the Process, discharge their duties. Hence, the petitioner should move the court for execution of the Process issued against Respondent No. 5.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move the court who has issued the Process in question against Respondent No. 5. (Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T