Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5233 of 2015 Arising Out of Case No.-24405 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Registered Office 1 Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070; Regional Office: 401, 4th Floor, Rohini Apartment, Opp. Hotel Apsara, 56 Circular Road, New Lalpur Chauyrah, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001.

2.

Managing Director and C.E.O Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj New Delhi- 110070.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Thakur Kumar Lallan Ji Son of Late Dr. Dhurendra Narain Singh, Resident of West Lohanipur, Kali Bhawan, P.S- Kadamkuan, District - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For the O.P. No. 2 :

Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioners; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have assisted the Court.

2. From perusal of the application, the Court finds that the petitioners are Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and Managing Director and its C.E.O. However, from perusal of the Vakalatnama on record, it transpires that one Vikas Gupta has executed power and his designation is written as "MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. 307-308, Vasundhara Metro Mall, Raja Purpul, East Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001". In the main

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5233 of 2015(5) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 body of the Vakalatnama no name of the person through whom the application is being filed and his capacity or authorisation to file such power, either on behalf of the petitioner no. 1 or petitioner no. 2 has been detailed.

3. In such view of the matter, the Court finds that the present application is totally not maintainable.

4. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

5. Let the Stamp Reporting Section explain as to how such glaring defect in the application was not pointed as defect at the time of reporting. The Registrar General shall obtain explanation and take appropriate action. Registry shall communicate the order to the Registrar General forthwith for compliance.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- U T