← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46769/2022allowed

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-15Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46769 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2022 Thana- SHYAMPUR BHATHA District- Sheohar ====================================================== Santosh Kumar, Son of Late kameshwar Mahto Resident of Ward No. 14, Nagar Parishad Sheohar, Police Station and District - Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-02-2023 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shaympur Bhathan P.S. Case No. 71 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case as emerges from the FIR is that the informant is the field staff of Muthooth Microfin Limited and on 08.04.2022, when he was returning from Gosaipur Bandobasti Tola by motorcycle after collecting Rs. 1,34,242/-, three persons with pipe and iron rod in their hands assaulted the informant and also snatched the

2/4 collected money, Tab, I-card and Mobile Charger. It is further been alleged that the villagers identified two of the accused persons as Shivnath Paswan and Sanjay Paswan. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that investigation in this case is complete and charge-sheet has already been submitted.

He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 22.05.2022.

It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.

However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

3/4 this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Shaympur Bhathan P.S. Case No. 71 of 2022, after framing of the charge, if not already framed on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

4/4 below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) ramesh/- U T