← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3120/2013disposed

Amarjeet Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-14Mr. Justice V. Nath3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3120 of 2013 ====================================================== Amarjeet Choudhary S/O Late Rambachhan Choudhary R/O VillageKapadhar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, P.O.- Sakhe Khas, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Collector, Gopalganj

2. The S.D.O., Hathua, District- Gopalganj

3. The D.C.L.R., Hathua, Gopalganj

4. The President Bhudan Yagna Committee, Patna

5. The Circle Officer, Uchkagaon, Gopalganj

6. District Minister, Bhudan Yagna Committee, Gopalganj

7. Dharamnath Singh S/O Bagrasan Singh R/O Kaparhar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

8. Dwarika Singh S/O Sitaram Singh R/O Kaparhar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

9. Mohanlal Singh S/O Ramjeet Singh R/O Kaparhar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

10. Vijaymal Singh S/O Ramjeet Singh R/O Village- Luhsi, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

11. Jodha Sah S/O Pnghit Sah R/O Village- Luhsi, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj .... .... Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.S.S.Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Adv.

Mr.Rakesh Chandra, Adv.

Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, Adv.

Mr.Parth Gaurav, Adv.

Mr.Satyendra Shukla, Adv.

For the Respondent Nos. 7 to 11:Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2015 Heard Mr.S.S.Dwivedi, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

Mr.S.S.Dwivedi, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has, at the outset, submitted that this application has been filed against the orders of the courts

Patna High Court CWJC No.3120 of 2013 (5) dt.14-12-2015 below refusing the prayer for injunction of the plaintiff-petitioner in the suit. It has been pointed out that the prayer for injunction was for restraining the defendant-respondents 1st set from making construction of school building in the suit property. It has, however, been further submitted by the learned senior counsel that the school building has been constructed now and the respondents are going to construct the further floors over the building and it has been therefore now prayed that this application may be disposed of with direction to the court below to dispose of the suit on merits within a time frame and till then no further construction shall be made by the State-respondents in the school building.

It has been further pointed out by the learned senior counsel that the relief for injunction in the suit was confined only against the Staterespondents as the construction was being made by them. The learned counsel appearing for the Staterespondent has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for disposal of the suit within a fixed time and has also submitted that the State-respondent would not make construction of further floors in the school building till the disposal of the suit.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3120 of 2013 (5) dt.14-12-2015 fixed for disposal of the suit.

After considering the submissions and the facts of the case, this writ application is disposed of in view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the State-respondent with direction to the court below to dispose of the suit preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and till then the State-respondents would not make further floors in the school building as stated by the learned counsel for the State-respondent. It is also made clear that the learned court below shall not grant unnecessary adjournments to the parties and shall make all endeavours to dispose of the suit within the aforesaid time frame. The learned counsel for the parties appearing before this Court have jointly submitted that they would fully cooperate in the hearing and disposal of the suit within the aforesaid time frame.

The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with aforesaid directions.

(V. Nath, J) Nitesh/- U