Nagendra Nath Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Arun Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2570 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1556 of 2009 ====================================================== Nagendra Nath Singh, Son of Late Bhagwan Singh, Resident of C-199, Police Colony, P.O. Anisabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through Arun Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna;
2. Mohan Paswan, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna;
3. Gunja Lal Ram, Chief Engineer, Gandak Project Siwan and Gopalganj Water Resources Department, Bihar, Siwan.
4. Keshav Kumar Singh, Joint Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, Patna;
5. Chandra Shekhar Choudhary, Deputy Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna;
6. Kaushal Kishore Mishra, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna.
... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :
Mr.Ajay Kr. Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 02.02.2009 passed in CWJC No. 1556 of 2009.
3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party Nos. 2 and 3, Annexure-A whereof being an order dated 23.01.2019 passed by the Chief Engineer, Irrigation Creation, Water Resources
Patna High Court MJC No.2570 of 2016 dt.18-04-2019 2/2 Department, Siwan discloses that all the consequential monetary benefits of 2nd ACP including the differences of post retirement benefits have already been paid to the petitioner by a speaking order and thus it is submitted that the order of this Court stands complied with.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly accepts that the order of this Court has been complied.
5. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 2570 of 2016 stands disposed of.
BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 21.04.2019 Transmission Date N.A.