Rajo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44953 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2017 Thana -BUNIADGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Rajo Yadav, Son of Gulabchand Yadav, r/o village- Kukiyasin, P.S.- Buniyadganj, District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2017 (G.R. No. 2519 of 2017) instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307, 379, 354 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code.
There is allegation against the petitioner of assaulting son of the informant with Garansa on his head. The injury report of the son of the informant has been enclosed as Annexure-3 wherein the Doctor has found two injuries which were found to be simple in nature.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44953 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 57 of 2017 (G.R. No. 2519 of 2017), he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T