← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8648/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Shirish Kumar Bharadwaj v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-03Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8648 of 2016 ====================================================== Shirish Kumar Bharadwaj S/o Late R.L. Bhardwaj, R/o 2H/101 Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Patna- 800026.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Bihar State Housing Board, Bahadurpur Housing Colony 3.

The Chairman, Bihar State Housing Board, Bahadurpur Housing Colony 4.

Asst. Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, Division 3 5.

Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, Division 3 6.

Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation 7.

Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna 8.

Officer-in-Charge, Agamkuan 9.

Circle Officer, Patna Sadar 10.

Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the State :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9 For the PMC :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Sr. Adv Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv For Housing Board :

Mrs. Binita Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-State is present. Learned counsel Mrs. Binita Singh for Bihar State Housing Board and Mr. Prabhat Kumar, learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation are also present.

2. On the previous date i.e. on 19.06.2025 also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ application. It was made clear by this Court that if no one

Patna High Court CWJC No.8648 of 2016(8) dt.03-07-2025 2/2 appears on the next date to press the writ application then this Court will consider dismissing the case for non-prosecution.

3. Today when the case is called out, again no one had appeared before this Court to press the writ application. It is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ application. Under these circumstances, the writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) kiran/- U