← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4612/2016dismissed

Rehana Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-04-30Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4612 of 2016 ====================================================== Rehana Khatoon wife of Nashim Akhtar Resident of Mohalla Karimganj Gumti No. 2, Police Station Civil Lines, District Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Gaya Municipal Corporation through its Municipal Committee. 4.

The Municipal Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya. 5.

The Executive Engineer Gaya Municipal Corporation Gaya. 6.

The Station Head Officer, Civil Lines Police Station, Gaya. 7.

Ghulam Sarwar Khan 8.

Tufail Ahmad Khan Both sons of Late Shamsi Ahmad Khan 9.

Wasi Ahmad Khan son of Late Shamsher Ahmad Khan 10.

Farhan Khan son of Late Shafi Ahmad Khan All residents of Mohalla Karimganj Railway Gumti No. 2 Police Station Civil Lines, District Gaya. 11.

Alfi Builders and Developers through its Director namely Sajid Parwez son of Md. Siddique Alam resident of B-3 Mohalla Enayat Colony Police Station Civil Lines District Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, SC-11 Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 On the last occasion i.e. on 11.04.2025 when the case was called out no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ application. One more opportunity was granted to the petitioner, but even today no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ application.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4612 of 2016(4) dt.30-04-2025 2/2

2. It is thus clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the present case, hence the writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U