Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51190 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2024 Thana- Shahartelpa P.S. District- Arwal ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Son Of Ramu Prasad @ Ramu Bhagat R/O-Village- Bhadasi, Ps -Arwal, District- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ritambhara Kumari, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. U.N. Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sahar Telpa P.S. Case No. 10 of 2024 dated 16.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3.
As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants boarded on two motorcycles snatched bag and Rs. 30,000/- from the informant on the point of pistol.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner was transpired in this case merely on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51190 of 2024(2) dt.12-08-2024 2/2 prosecution. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that during the course of investigation, one black colored pulsor motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jehanabad in connection with Sahar Telpa P.S. Case No. 10 of 2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T