← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45260/2019bail granted

Shabnam Yadav @ Sumit Kumar @ Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-25Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45260 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== SHABNAM YADAV @ SUMIT KUMAR @ SUNIL YADAV, Son of Sri Buchan Yadav @ Braj Kishor Yadav, Resident of Village - Maujam Patti, P.S.- Barahara, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 25-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Barhara (Raghuvanshnagar) P.S. Case No.62 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302, 120-B/34 Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. It is mentioned in the impugned order that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of Rajendra Ojha and Maharaj Singh. Except the aforesaid confessional statements, there is no allegation of any other specific overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45260 of 2019(2) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, II, Purnea, in connection with Barhara (Raghubanshnagar) P.S. Case No.62 of 2019, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T