← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33428/2015dismiss for nonprosecution

Vinay Sharma And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2023-03-13Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33428 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-645 Year-2014 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== 1.

Vinay Sharma son of Late Dhanraj Sharma.

2.

Devanti Devi wife of Vinay Sharma 3.

Sunil Sharma @ Sunil Kumar Sharma son of Vinay Sharma 4.

Indu Devi @ Indu Kumari Sharma wife of Sunil Sharma @ Sunil Kumar Sharma All resident of East Gumati Lakh No. 11, Police Station- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Sangita Sharma wife of Santosh Sharma, daughter of Ram Kumar Sharma, resident of East Gumti Lakh No. 11, Plice Station- Ara Nawada, DistrictBhojpur. At present of S.N. Engineering, Ward no.16, Ara Road, Bikramganj, Police Station- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-03-2023 No one appears on call.

On 22.2.2023, the following order was passed: "No one appears on call.

Learned counsel for the informant is present.

This petition is preferred for quashing of the order dated 25.5.2015 passed by learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33428 of 2015(4) dt.13-03-2023 2/2 Bikramganj, Rohtas in Complaint Case No. 645 of 2014 whereby the Court below issued processes under Sections 323, 379 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the case.

As a last chance, list this matter after two weeks, if no representation is there, an order will be passed.

It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in the case.

The petition is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points at an appropriate stage before the trial Court. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T