Dudhnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46980 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2022 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Dudhnath Yadav S/O Sh. Saral Yadav R/O Village- Kohara Bhawanipur, P.S.- Srinagar, District- West Champaran 2.

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Yadav S/O Sh. Saral Yadav R/O Village- Kohara Bhawanipur, P.S.- Srinagar, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the anticipatory bail application against petitioner No. 2 because police has filed the final form against him. Accordingly, this application as against petitioner No. 2 is dismissed as not pressed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, if any, within three weeks. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46980 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant as well as his father-in-law.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that injury was kept reserve. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 46 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) guddukr/- U T