← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50776/2014dismissed

Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-03Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50776 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2014 Thana -CHANAN District- BANKA ====================================================== Manoj Yadav son of Basudeo Yadav, Resident of village- Kageshar, P.S.- Katoriya, District- Banka .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anuj Kr.Srivastav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far this case is concerned, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade and his name has come subsequently as he was apprehended by the SAF Jawan on the very next date after the first information report was lodged as he along with another person was allegedly riding motorcycle which was without any registration number and on search one country-made pistol and three live cartridges were recovered from the possession of this petitioner and another accused who was driving the motorcycle, namely, Hari Yadav was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50776 of 2014 (3) dt.03-03-2015 2/2 apprehended. Both of the accused persons have allegedly confessed their guilt.

It is submitted that on the basis of such confession the petitioner is being implicated in this matter. However, it appears that on the confessional statement of petitioner Manoj Yadav the snatched motorcycle was recovered from the forest near Bhounra Bazar.

In the aforementioned facts and circumstances and also specially in view of the criminal antecedents of the petitioner in two cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at this stage.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T