Alok Kumar @ Alok Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44945 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2024 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Alok Kumar @ Alok Mishra, Son of Gangadhar Mishra, Resident of VillageJanipur, P.S.- Nanpur, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 414, 34, 489(c), 489(d) and 489(e) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police had information that two persons are indulged in counterfeit currency business. On this information, police raided the tea shop. One Avnit kumar and Vikash Kumar were apprehended and from their possession, counterfeit currency was recovered. These petitioners named Sushil Mahto and from his house also counterfeit currency

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44945 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 was recovered. Sushil Mahto named this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Name of this petitioner has surfaced in the statement of co-accused but nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He is having no criminal antecedent. Save and except the statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 76 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitmarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T