← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46923/2022dismissed

Vijay Kumar @ Munna @ Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-23Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46923 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2018 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== VIJAY KUMAR @ MUNNA @ VIJAY KUMAR SINGH Son of Shambhu Prasad @ Shambhu Nath Singh Resident of Village - Bahrauli Kunwar Tola, P.s.- Mashrakh, Distt.- Saran (Chhapra), At Present Resident of Village - Gujaini, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

This is the fourth attempt of the petitioner to approach before this Court for bail. The petitioner has also preferred an application before the Hon'ble Apex Court which also stood dismissed.

Vide order dated 19.10.2022, a report was called for from the learned Court below regarding the stage of the trial and the time likely to be taken in conclusion of the trial. In

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46923 of 2022(3) dt.23-11-2022 2/2 compliance thereof, a report dated 02.11.2022 has been sent by the learned Judge. In his report, the learned Judge has, inter alia, stated that the trial may be concluded within three months. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby once again rejected.

The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months. If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T