Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12555 of 2013 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh Son Of Rajan Prasad Singh Resident Of Village - Bathotar, P.S. - B.Kothi, District - Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Purnea

5. The Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Purnea Division, Purnea

6. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Purnea Division, Purnea

7. The Circle Officer, Barhara Kothi, District - Purnea .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 08-03-2016 None for the petitioner.

Heard counsel for the State.

The writ application prays for a direction upon the respondents not to construct the road on his Raiyati land.

Counsel for the State, referring to diverse statements made in the counter affidavit, particularly those in paragraph 8 and 9, contended that the application has become infructuous as the portion of the road on the Raiyati land has been stopped and the construction made therefrom has been removed. There is no rejoinder to the said counter affidavit.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12555 of 2013 (2) dt.08-03-2016 2/2 In view of aforesaid, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U