Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56672 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2018 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Singh Yadav S/o- Prithvinath Singh, resident of Village- Gothahula, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.The State Of Bihar
2. Kirti Yadav, W/o Rahul Singh Yadav, R/o - Gothula, P.S. - Ara Muffasil, District - Bhojpur, at present C/o - Malti Singh, W/o - Jitendra Yadav, Panchkuan, Mari Road (Ujjain), M.P., House No. 341, P.S. - Chimmarganj, Pin - 456001.
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 214/2018 registered under Sections 341/323/504/147/506/379/498 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants resolution of disputes amicably and for that reason he is willing to visit the Maike of the opposite party no. 2 to bring her back to his matrimonial home. It is further submitted that on instruction that petitioner is ready and willing to take care of opposite party no. 2 and to keep her with full
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56672 of 2018(3) dt.21-01-2019 2/3 dignity and respect.
On this statement having been made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the opposite party no. 2 submits that even opposite party no. 2 is willing to restore the matrimonial relationship and is ready to go with the petitioner.
In the aforesaid view of the matter as submitted at the bar the petitioner will go to the Maike of opposite party no. 2 within a period of three weeks from today after giving prior information to jurisdictional Officer In-charge of the concerned Police Station within whose jurisdiction the opposite party no. 2 resides. He will go fully prepared to bring opposite party no. 2 to his matrimonial home and shall keep her with full dignity and care.
Subject to the aforesaid condition, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 214/2018 in connection with learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, subject to condition prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Code of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56672 of 2018(3) dt.21-01-2019 3/3 Criminal Procedure.
It is made clear that failure of the petitioner to abide by his own undertaking may be a reason for cancellation of bail if pointed out to this court in an appropriate application. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T