Shera Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53977 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Shera Manjhi S/O Siya Sharan Manjhi Resident of village- Linepar Mirzapur, PS- Nawada, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State :
Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302/34 of the IPC.
3. According to prosecution case, when the informant's husband was taking meal, co-accused Bablu Yadav called him on mobile phone. He went there but did not return. In the next morning, he was found near the house of Parakaran Chaudhary. The informant, on getting information, went there and saw his husband lying there in an injured condition. Parakaran Chaudhary called the police on toll free number 112. Informant's husband, in injured condition was taken to Sadar Hospital, Nawada for treatment and later on he was referred to VIMS, Pawapuri for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53977 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 2/3 better treatment but he died during treatment.
4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. It has further been submitted that co-accused Bablu Yadav had called the deceased and name of the petitioner transpired from the confessional statement of co-accused Bablu Yadav. Co-accused Bablu Yadav has been acquitted in Sessions Trial No. 331 of 2024 vide judgment and order dated 04.06.2025. The case of present petitioner stands on better footing than that of co-accused Bablu Yadav. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is under incarceration since 23.04.2025.
5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024 with condition that the petitioner shall cooperated with the trial of the case and make himself available as and when required by the court.
7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall physically appear before the learned court below on each and every date.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53977 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 3/3 In case of failure on two consecutive dates, unless he is prevented by extremely adverse circumstances, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T