Ranjan Mahton @ Mantu And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34603 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34603 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2017 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Ranjan Mahton @ Mantu, Son of Bachu Mahton,

2. Saurabh Kumar Son of Chandra Shekhar Mahton, Both Residents of Village- Nawagarhi, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-307 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per written report, on the date of occurrence, Manoj Mahto assaulted the informant with Khanti and this petitioner assaulted him with iron rod. When nephew of the informant came to save him, he was also assaulted. The injury reports of both the injured have been filed as Annexure-2 series wherein the doctor found lacerated wound, abrasion etc and no injury was found on the vital part of the body. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34603 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T