← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59802/2018dismissed

Manish Kumar Gupta v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2020-02-25Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59802 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2016 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Manish Kumar Gupta son of Late Verma Sah @ Brahma Sah resident of Village- Nawada Parsauni, Police Station- Uchkagaon, District Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Dinesh Sah son of Late Bhuwal Sah resident of Village- Parshurampur, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to O.P.no.2, vide order dated 18.7.2018 passed by Addl. District and Sessions Judge I, Gopalganj in connection with B.P.no.493 of 2018.

Ground for cancellation of bail is that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has relied on the statement of the girl made before the Executive Magistrate in para nos. 27 and 28 of the case dairy and in para no.26 postmortem report has been mentioned and that shows that the deceased was not in condition to make any statement.

Heard learned APP and perused the impugned order.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59802 of 2018(4) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 Learned Addl. Sessions Judge considering the statement of the deceased before the Executive Magistrate in which she has stated that fire caught from the stove and her minor daughter has also sustained burn injury and she has not stated about the hands of the O.P.no.2 in the occurrence, has granted bail to the O.P.no.2 There is no allegation of misuse of privilege of bail or tempering with the evidence or any chance of absconding of the O.P.no.2.

Considering the above, I find no merit in this application.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T