Sulekha Kumari @ Sulekha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51664 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
SULEKHA KUMARI @ SULEKHA W/O BRIJ LAL RAI R/O VILLAGEMUKUNDPUR, P.S- MAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI. 2.
KUNDAN KUMAR S/O RAKESH THAKUR R/O VILLAGEMUKUNDPUR, P.S- MAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI. 3.
BABLU KUMAR S/O LALIT RAI R/O VILLAGE- MUKUNDPUR, P.SMAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Santosh Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Matloob Rab , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 324, 379, 354, 307, 427, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
3 . As per prosecution case , on the alleged date and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51664 of 2024(2) dt.29-08-2024 2/3 time of occurrence , when informant along with his brothers went to sasural of his sister Rupam Kumari, then petitioner No. 1 started abusing them and thereafter it is alleged that all the accused persons including these petitioners assaulted informant and his sister and brothers causing injury to them. There is also allegation against them to outrage the modesty of sister of informant.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that specific accusation of assault is against other co-accused persons. So far as petitioner No. 1 is concerned, she is only alleged to have abused and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are not family members of the informant rather they are co-villagers and there is general and omnibus allegation against them. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition.
6 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51664 of 2024(2) dt.29-08-2024 3/3 the learned Cjm Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 138 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T