Sri Mukteshwar Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5616 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6305 of 2006 ====================================================== Sri Mukteshwar Prasad Sinha Son Of Late Shyamdeo Narayan Resident Of Village And P.O.-Shekhpur,. P.S.-Deshari, District-Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Collector, Vaishali At Hazipur Namely Sri Jitendra Srivastava

3. The Collector Cum Chairman, Fisharies Farmer Development Agencies, Vaishaili At Hazipur Namely Sri Jitendra Srivasatava

4. District Fishries Development Officer Cum Chief Executive Officer, Fisheries Farmer Development Agencies, Vaishali At Hazipur Namely Punam Kumari

5. The Addition Collector Cum Vice Chairman Fisheries Farmer Development Agencies Vaishali At Hazipur Namely Ramesh Mishra

6. The Circle Officer, Sahdai Buxar, P.O. And Sadai, District-Vaishali, Namely Kamni Kumari

7. Mahendra Sahani Son Of Fuddin Sahani Mantri Sahdai Buzurg Block Fisheries Farmers Co-Operative Society Limited, Village And P.O.- Shekhpur, P.S.-Desari, District-Vaishali Null

8. Shiv Charan Sahani Son Of Late Mahabir Sahani Chief Executive Sahdai Buzurg Fisheries Farmer Self Contained (Swablbali) CoOperative Society Ltd. Village P.O. And P.S.-Sahdai Buzurg DistrictVaishail .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratan Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Namrta Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

In view of the second supplementary show cause filed today, it appears that vide memo no. 270 dated 3.5.2017, the District Fisheries Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer- Vaishali has withdrawn the order by which the adversary of the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.5616 of 2013 (17) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 was settled with the pond. It thus appears that the authorities have now rectified their wrong which had occasioned this petitioner to come to this Court.

There being substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court, the contempt application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner if so advised to raise any issue before the authorities.

(Anjana Mishra, J) S.Pandey/- U