Patna High CourtMJC/3458/2013disposed

Md. Qamerul Hodda v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-17Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3458 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4201 of 2005 ====================================================== Md. Qamerul Hodda S/O Late Md. Mojibur Rahman Resident Of MohallaTalakhapur Dumra Kothi Tola, P.O- Dumra (Sitamarhi Court), P.SSitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Ashok Kumar Sinha, The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. Pratima Verma The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4. Rajesh Kumar The Sub Divisional Officer,Sitamarhi Sadar, Sitamarhi.

5. Ashok Kumar The Circle Officer Dumra, Sitamarhi.

6. Md. Motiour Rahman S/O Late Mosibur Rahman Mohalla Talakhapur Dumara Kothi Tola, P.O- Sitamarhi Court, P.S- Sitamarhi, DistrictSitamarhi.

7. Rahman S/O Mohalla- Talakhapur Dumara Kothi Tola, P.O- Sitamarhi Court, P.S- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

8. Musmat Nasibul W/O Late Adam Mohalla- Talakhapur Dumara Kothi Tola, P.O- Sitamarhi Court, P.S- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi,

9. Md. Mustakim son of late Abdul Mian, resident of mohalla Talakhapur Dumara Kothi Tola, P.O- Sitamarhi Court, P.S- Sitamarhi, DistrictSitamarhi,

10. Md. Hussain son of Abdul Mian, resident of mohalla Talakhapur Dumara Kothi Tola, P.O- Sitamarhi Court, P.S- Sitamarhi, DistrictSitamarhi, .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumud Kumar Shrivastaw, Advocate For the State : Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, PAAG 2, Mr. Niraj Kumar Sinha, AC to PAAG 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 17-08-2016 The Circle Officer, Dumra, Sitamarhi, has appeared in person.

In view of the statement made in the affidavit filed today

Patna High Court MJC No.3458 of 2013 (20) dt.17-08-2016 on behalf of the opposite party nos. 3 to 5 stating categorically that the opposite party nos. 6 to 10 have not encroached the land. In my view, this proceeding cannot proceed further. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped. The personal appearance of the Circle Officer, Dumra, Sitamarhi, is dispensed with.

However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved he will be at liberty to raise the issue before a competent authority. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U