Patna High CourtMJC/4586/2013disposed

Shivendu And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-11Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4586 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Shivendu Son of Kailash Yadav Resident of Village + P.O.- Islam Nagar, Anchal- Islam Nagar-Aliganj, District- Jamui.

2. Anil Kumar Son of Sri Shiv Shankar Yadav Resident of VillageMadha, P.O.- Chorbar, P.S.- Pakribarawan, District- Nawadah. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Amarjeet Sinha. null null

2. The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, Bihar Education Project, Jamui, namely Sri Shashi Kant Tiwari.

3. The Project Programme Officer-cum-District Programme Coordinator, Jamui, District- Jamui, namely Sri Rajdeo Ram.

4. The Block Education Officer, Islam Nagar-Aliganj, District-Jamui, namely Sri Umeshwar Mahto.

5. The State Project Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Patna, namely Sri Rahul Singh.

6. The District Gender Coordinator, Bihar Education Project, Jamui, District- Jamui, namely Smt. Krishna Kumar Sinha.

7. The Headmaster-cum-Conveyor, Middle School, Islam Nagar-cumKasturba Gandhi, Girls School, Islam Nagar, Anchal- Islam, NagarAliganj, District- Jamui, namely Sri Jagdish Yadav. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Singh, G.P. 6 For the B.E.P.C. : Mr. G. Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-05-2016 Counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the respondents are present.

The petitioners filed C.W.J.C. No. 8326 of 2013 for payment of his remuneration for which they had already filed representation on 10.01.2013 to the District Programme Officer, Jamui.

Patna High Court MJC No.4586 of 2013 (3) dt.11-05-2016 2/2 The writ petition was disposed on 14.05.2013, with direction to the Project Programme Officer-cum-District Programme Coordinator, Jamui, to dispose of the petitioners' representation, dated 10.01.2013.

Learned counsel submits that inspite of order of this Court, the Opposite Parties have not disposed of their representation and have deliberately committed contempt of the order passed by this Court. He next submits that dues upto 2014 has not been paid till date.

Learned counsel for the Bihar Education Project submits that there is due compliance of the order, dated 14.05.2013, as direction has been issued to make payment of remuneration of the petitioner.

I find there is substantial compliance order, dated 14.05.2013 and hence, the contempt application is accordingly closed.

It will be open for the petitioner to file representation for payment of its upto date remuneration.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) kunal/- U