Sudarshan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3562 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Sudarshan Sharma S/O Sri Ragho Sharma, resident of Village- Ganeyari, P.O- Pariyari, P.S.- Kinjar, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Patna.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal- Sc25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 6.

09-05-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been paid admissible post retired dues except leave encashment. He submits that the issue is to entitlement of leave encashment is no more res integra. The issue was answered by a Coordinate Bench in C.W.J.C. No.23 of 2015 vide order dated 03.08.2015 which was affirmed by the LPA Court in L.P.A. No.1856 of 2016 vide order dated 16.03.2017.

In view of the above, the respondents are directed to ensure payment of leave encashment to the petitioner within a maximum

Patna High Court CWJC No.3562 of 2016 (6) dt.09-05-2018 2/2 period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, this writ application is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sanjeev/- U