Kampani Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46110 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2026 Thana- Tetiyabumber District- Munger ====================================================== Kampani Singh Son of Satto Singh Resident of Village/ Mohalla- Farsa, P.S.- Tetiya Bumber, District- Mungar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. N.N. Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.N. Tiwary, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tetiya Bumber P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 instituted for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 110, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons brutally assaulted the informant's son, causing grievous head injuries and rendering him unconscious. During the informant's absence for medical treatment, the accused allegedly committed theft of 1,00,000/- and gold ornaments from the ₹ informant's house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46110 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further contended that the informant is not the eye witness to the alleged occurrence which is evident from the perusal of the FIR. He further contended that there is land dispute between the parties. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Tetiya Bumber P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T