Patna High CourtCWJC/17361/2013dfd for non appearance

Anil Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-17Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17361 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar Singh Son Of Late Nand Lal Singh Resident Of Village - Mahuawa Tola Gore, Police Station - Pipara, District - East Champaran

2. Amit Kumar @ Bablu Son Of Anil Kumar Singh Resident Of Village - Mahuawa Tola Gore, Police Station - Pipara, District - East Champaran

3. Sumit Kumar @ Bulet Son Of Anil Kumar Singh Resident Of Village - Mahuawa Tola Gore, Police Station - Pipara, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

3. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari

4. The L.R.D.C., Chakiya, East Champaran

5. The Circle Officer, Circle Chakiya, District - East Champaran

6. The Officer - In - Charge, Pipra Police Station, District East Champaran

7. Arun Kumar Singh Son Of Late Nand Lal Singh Resident Of Village - Mahuawa Tola Gore, District - East Champaran

8. Navin Kumar Singh Son Of Late Nand Lal Singh Resident Of Village - Mahuawa Tola Gore, District - East Champaran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishiraj Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 17-05-2016 Despite repeated calls nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application. The counsel for the State points out that the writ application assails the order dated 19.2.2013 (Annexure-3) passed by the respondent Commissioner in Land Dispute Appeal no. 543 of 2012-13 against which an appeal or application can be filed before the land Tribunal after amendments made in the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17361 of 2013 (3) dt.17-05-2016 2/2 Be that as it may since no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U