Gaya Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.16393 of 2013 (3) dt.17-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16393 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Gaya Prasad Gupta S/O Late Gariba Rai Resident Of Village- Lakhnu Sarai, Barkee Karpurwa, P.S- Sasaram, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas At Sasaram.

3. The Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Rohtas At Sasaram.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas At Sasaram.

5. The Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Sasaram.

6. The Block Development Officer, Rohtas At Sasaram.

7. The District Council Of Rohtas At Sasaram. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nirbhay K.Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 17-05-2016 Despite repeated calls no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application. The counsel for the respondent -Zila Parishad has drawn attention of the Court to the order dated 25.04.2016 which records as under:- "The Court was not inclined to grant adjournment but Mr. Manu, the counsel for the petitioner in presence of the counsel for the respondent Zila Parishad, states that the present status of the shop shall be placed by way of a supplementary affidavit.

As requested, the Court grants time till Friday (29.04.2016) to file supplementary affidavit.

List after a week."

It is also stated that the counter affidavit has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.16393 of 2013 (3) dt.17-05-2016 filed showing the basic flaws in the prayer made in the writ application. Be that as it may since no one has appeared to press this application, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U