Yakub v. State Of Bihar And ANR
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34581 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34581 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2017 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Yakub S/o Abdul Hamid Sheikh, R/o 34-35 1st Floor, B.N. Singh Dormentory Building No.5, Sabu Siddhik Road, Musafir Khana, Mumbai400001. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sanjay Kumar, Son of Sri Harishchandra Singh, R/o Dhanarua Bazar, P.S.- Dhanaura, District- Patna.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Complaint Case No. 50 C of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-420, 406, 467 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per complaint petition, there is specific allegation against accused No. 1. From the complaint petition itself, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 50 C of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34581 of 2017 (2) dt.26-07-2017 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T