Umesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2408 of 2016 ====================================================== Umesh Kumar son of Deoki Bhagat resident of Village - Manikauli, P.S. - Singhwara, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga. 3.

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Darbhanga through its Member.

4.

The Block Development Officer, Jale, Block - Jale, District - Darbhanga. 5.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj - Muraitha Jale, District - Darbhanga.

6.

Satyanarayan Kumar Gupta son of Rajendra Prasad Gupta resident of Village - Dighopatti, P.O. - Bandhauli, P.S. - Jale, District - Darbhanga. 7.

Deepak Kumar S/o Rajendra Choudhary resident of Village - Chahunta, Post - Kamtaul, P.S. - Bisfi, District - Madhubani. 8.

Vandana Kumari D/o Sudhir Choudhary resident of Village Post - Dhadhiya, P.S. - Jale, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chaudhary Prem Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rajesh Singh- GP 16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned. 2.

The petitioner, being aggrieved by the order dated 14.03.2012, passed in Objection Case no. 122 of 2011, by the District Teachers Appellate Authority, directly approached this Court, without approaching the State Appellate Authority. 3.

In view of the nature of dispute, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority, by

Patna High Court CWJC No.2408 of 2016(6) dt.22-04-2024 2/2 filing an appeal, against the order dated 14.03.2012, passed by the District Appellate Authority. If such an appeal is preferred by the petitioner along with petition for condonation of delay, the same shall be considered by the State Appellate Authority on its own merit, within a reasonable time frame, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned.

5.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ application is disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) rinkee/- U