← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1583/2015disposed

Sheo Shankar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-08Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 1583 of 2015 ====================================================== Sheo Shankar Chaudhary Son of Late Hiralal Chaudhary resident of MohallaSamsa P.O. Sadisopur, P.S. Bihta, District Patna At present Bari Khagaul Mulchhari Asthan Ward No. 20 Sub Division Danapur, District Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Land & Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. District Magistrate, Patna

4. Anchal Adhikari Dulhin Bazar, P.S. Dulhin Bazar District Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Arun Kumar, Advocate For the S t a t e :

Mr Rajeev Shekhar, AC to GA XIII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

2 It is agreed between the parties that claim of the petitioner in respect of benefits arising out of Assured Career Progression (for brevity, ACP) Scheme have not been dealt with in the counter affidavit earlier filed. All other benefits have been received by the petitioner.

3 From the averments made in paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit, it appears that the matter regarding grant of ACP was to be placed in the next meeting of the District Screening Committee. Counter affidavit was filed on 27.11.2015.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1583 of 2015 dt.08-01-2019 2/2 4 Considering the aforesaid circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending. 5 Parties are in agreement that the matter be disposed of. If the claim of the petitioner has not been considered till date, the same must be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 6 The authorities would be obliged to consider the petitioner's claim for grant of ACP in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order.

7 Writ petition stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 10.01.2019 Transmission Date NA