Savitri Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1431 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.243 of 2007 ====================================================== Savitri Sharma wife of Late Devendra Nath Sharma resident of House No. 14, Phase- II, Ashiana Nagar, Police Station- Shastri Nagar in the district of Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

Sri Chanchal Kumar, the Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Dharmendra Singh Gangwar, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Sri Pratya Amrit, the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Sri M. Rama Chandran Tuddu, the Director, Secretary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Sri Sanjay Kumar, Accountant General (A and E) II, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh, GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-11-2019 The petitioner has prayed for the following relief :- "It is, therefore, prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to admit this application, issue notice to Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the contempt proceeding be not initiated against them for deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court, as contained in Annexure-1 to this application and on return of the rule and in the same event of

Patna High Court MJC No.1431 of 2016(4) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 Opp. Parties showing no sufficient cause, the rule be made absolute and Opp. Parties be punished for deliberately and willfully flouting the order, as contained in Annexure-1 herein passed by this Hon'ble Court."

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to take recourse of his remedies before the appropriate authority. Permission granted.

As prayed for, the present petition stands disposed as having been withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the appropriate authority in accordance with law which shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/DKS U