← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45250/2025bail granted

Veer Abhimanyu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-16Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45250 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2025 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Veer Abhimanyu, S/o Devkant Jha, R/o Village- Pacharwa, Thana- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sumit Kumar Bubna, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 163 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S. 2023.

3. As per allegation, on account of property dispute, the occurrence took place in which injury was caused on the person of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner and the informant are close family members. The informant is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45250 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/3 brother of one accused and son of another accused. He also submits that the alleged injury is simple in nature. Other allegations against the petitioner are concocted.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 163 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45250 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 3/3 below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T