Narendra Giri v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5806 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17349 of 2012 ====================================================== Narendra Giri, S/O Sri Sidheshwar Giri, Resident Of Village Tawakala Bichali Mathia, P.O. Sakari Khurd, P.S. Parasi District Arwal At Present Posted As Incharge Principal, Rajkiyakrit Inter High School, Injore, P.O. Injore, District Arwal.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Abhijeet Sinha, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
2. Sri Kuar Jang Bahadur, the District Magistrate, Arwal, District Arwal.
3. Sri Ram Bujhawan Chaudhary, the Director Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Budha Marg, Patna-800001.
4. Sri M. Das, the Regional Deputy Director Education, Gaya.
5. Smt. Rina Kumari, the District Education Officer, At & P.O. & P.S. Arwal, District Arwal.
6. Sri P. Banarjee, The District Program Officer (Establishment), District Eduction Officer Office, At & P.O. & P.S. Arwal, District Arwal.
7. Punyadeo Kumar S/O Late Ram Janam Singh, Resident Of Village & P.O. Sarwan, P.S. Rampur Chauram, District Arwal At Present Posted As Assistant Teacher, Rajkiyakrit Inter High School, Injore, P.O. Injore, District Arwal.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat, Senior Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-IV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 Keeping in view the order passed by the respondents as contained in Annexure-A to the show cause rejecting the representation of the petitioner, now no further action is required to be taken in the matter. In case, the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which representation is considered and rejected, liberty shall be
Patna High Court MJC No.5806 of 2013 (5) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 available to the petitioner to challenge the order in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U