← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15985/2016disposed

Anusha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-05-07Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15985 of 2016 ====================================================== Anusha Kumari D/o Chhabinath Ram R/o Village and P.O.Dhavpokhar, P.S. Karamchat Sabar, District Kaimur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Distt. Teacher Niycjan Appellate Pradhikar, Rohtas Sasaram 3.

The Collector, Rohtas 4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas 5.

The Superintendent of Education, Rohtas 6.

Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna. 7.

Block Development Officer, Sheosagar, Dist. Rohtas 8.

Block Education Officer, Rohtas 9.

Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Silari, Sheosagar, Rohtas 10.

Urmila Devi D/o Late Ramrup Ram, W/o Sheojagi Ram R/o Village Kurtha, P.O. Baraila, District Rohtas ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rewti Kant Raman For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amit Bhushan, AC to GP-17 For the S. S. Board :

Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

2. The petitioner has filed the present writ application, being aggrieved by the order, dated 08.07.2016, passed by the Office of Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Silari, Sheosagar, Rohtas, by which the petitioner has been terminated from the post of Panchayat Teacher.

3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the District Appellate Authority has been constituted under the Rules

Patna High Court CWJC No.15985 of 2016(2) dt.07-05-2024 2/2 for hearing the grievances of the teachers. The petitioner has directly approached this Court without availing the remedy before the District Teachers Appellate Authority.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present writ application is disposed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned District Teachers Appellate Authority against the impugned order.

5. It is made clear that if an appeal is filed within one month from today, along with condonation of delay petition, the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority shall consider the same and shall pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, within a reasonable time frame.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application is disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) ashwani/- U