Bittu Kumar @ Rajiv Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51025 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2025 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna ====================================================== Bittu Kumar @ Rajiv Raj son of Sanjit Kumar Jaswal @ Sanjit Jaswal Village- Nandgola, Ps- Malsalami, dist- patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Bihari Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Kankarbag P.S. Case No.240 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 303(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 pending before the court of A.C.J.M.-XI, Patna.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 3 named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation of assault by knife and loot of gold chain and Rs.5000/- cash from the pocket of informant.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and all

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51025 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 allegations are vague in nature. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from petitioner's possession.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there is one criminal case pending against him in which he is on bail. He further submits that petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is allegation against the petitioner of damaging the eye of informant and looted his money .

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 6 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T