Virendra Bhagat And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1067 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.

Virendra Bhagat S/O Late Rambali Bhakta Resident Of Village - Chawhi Takki, P.O. Gopalganj, District Gopalganj 2.

Lalan Mahto Son Of Late Nathuni Mahto Resident Of Village - Jagarnatha, P.O. Manjhagarh, District Gopalganj 3.

Ravindra Nath Prasad Son Of Shivpujan Prasad Resident Of Village - Manjhagarh, Sudha Sah Ka Tola, P.O. Manjhagarh, Distt. Gopalganj 4.

Binod Kumar Son Of Dinanath Prasad Resident Of Village - Manjhagarh, P.O. Manjhagarh, District Gopalganj 5.

Tuntun Thakur Son Of Late Badar Thakur Resident Of Village - Karnpura, P.O.Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director-In-Chief, Health Services, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Chief Malaria Officer, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Gopalganj 5.

The District Malaria Officer, Gopalganj 6.

Incharge, Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Manjhagarh, Distt. Gopalganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar AC to GP24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-10-2019 Heard Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned AC to GP-24 for the State.

2. It is submitted by the petitioners'

counsel that on account of their causal work (D.D.T. workers), the petitioners' name has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.1067 of 2012(4) dt.21-10-2019 2/2 included in the panel being prepared by the Collectorate.

3. In view of such submission, the relief(s) claimed in the writ petition, need not be considered, at this stage, as it is only if the petitioners are not successful in the process that they may have a grievance.

4. The writ petition is disposed off, in view of the aforesaid developments, as stated by the petitioners' counsel.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U