← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2373/2012dismiss for nonprosecution

Rakesh Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2019-11-04Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2373 of 2012 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar, Son Of Sri Dinesh Choudhary, Resident Of Village + P.O.- Bishnupur, P.S. - Sahapur Kamal, District-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Home Secretary, Government of India, New Delhi 2.

The Director General of Police, Central Armed Police Force, New Delhi 3.

The Director General, B.S.F., New Delhi 4.

The I.G., B.S.F., North Bengal Frontier, P.O.-Kadamtala, District-Darjeeling West Bengal-734011 5.

The Chief Medical Officer (S.G.), 95 Bn, B.S.F. Kadamtala, DistrictDarjeeling West Bengal 6.

Dr. P.K. Agrawal, Con. GDMO, B.S.F., P.O. Kadamtala, District-Darjeeling, West Bengal ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

N O N E For the Respondent/s :

Ms Priya Gupta, Advocate Mr R K Sharma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-11-2019 The relief, claimed in the writ petition, is for quashing the report of the Review Medical Board conducted by the respondent-Force Authorities on 30.11.2011. The petitioner has been found unfit in the process of selection for Constable (General Duty) in the respondent-Force.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Union of India that no grounds have been specified necessitating interference with findings of the Review Medical Board. The level of fitness required for the respondent-Force does not allow

Patna High Court CWJC No.2373 of 2012(3) dt.04-11-2019 2/2 latitude to the respondent-Authorities, who have proceeded strictly as per the requisite level of Medical fitness from the competing candidates.

Since, none appears for the petitioner, without going into the merits of the said submission, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U