Ranjan Yadav @ Rajan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54072 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2019 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Rajan Yadav Son Of Bharat Yadav Resident Of VillageChitriya Jagiraha, Ps. Kotwa, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, on 19.07.2019 at Village Bakhari Bazar near NH-28 the unknown miscreants had committed dacoity and snatched the motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR05AC-2555, cash of Rs. 2,500/- and other articles from the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Neither the petitioner is named in the FIR nor put on TIP. His

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54072 of 2023(2) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 name has been transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement before the police, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Nothing looted articles has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Save and except confessional statement no consistent evidence has come against the petitioner during investigation in respect of commission of offence. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 16.05.023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., East Champaran in connection with Pipra PS Case No.246 of 2019.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T