← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52969/2024bail granted

Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52969 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2024 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Vijay Kumar, S/o Late Ghan Shyam Sah R/o Village Prem Nagar PS Runnisaidpur Dist Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a sack.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a sack, which does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar. It is next submitted that police in majority of cases implicating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52969 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 2/3 innocent persons either at the behest of Chaukidar or local person, which cast an aspersion of the case of the prosecution as implication appears to be mechanical, when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It does not stand to reason that how the Chaukidar identified the petitioner when petitioner is not known to him.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-1, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P. S. Case No.156 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52969 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 3/3 found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T