Patna High CourtCWJC/23868/2013withdrawn

M/S Magadh Tube Well Engineering Works v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-30Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23868 of 2013 ======================================================

1. M/S Magadh Tube Well Engineering Works, Gaya Through Its Proprietor Rajendra Prasad Son Of Shri Deo Sharan Prasad Resident Of Cutcherry Road, Police Station Civil Lines, Town And District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Urban Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Urban Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya

4. Gaya Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner, Gaya

5. Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya

6. The District Magistrate, Gaya

7. The Gaya Municipal Corporation through its Chief Executive Officer, District - Gaya

8. Chief Executive Officer, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya

9. R.R. Prasad Singh, the Then Executive Engineer, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya

10. Ashok Kumar Singh Then Executive Engineer, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya

11. The Gaya Water Board, Through Executive Engineer, Gaya

12. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gaya Sadar, Gaya .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Dikshit For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaya Municipal Corporation. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to withdraw the present writ application with the permission to approach the concerned respondents for redressal of his grievance.

The permission is granted.

It is thus dismissed as withdrawn.

Patna High Court CWJC No.23868 of 2013 (6) dt.30-10-2017 2/2 It is made clear that this Court is not passing any observation on the merits of the claim of the petitioner which may be considered by the Respondents in accordance with law. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U