← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45468/2025allowed

Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-16Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45468 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2025 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Aman Kumar Son of Binay Singh @ Vinay Kumar Resident of - Noniya Bigaha, P.S.- Arwal, District - Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nand Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8(C)/21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether 6.30 gm of smack was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the contraband which has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45468 of 2025(4) dt.16-09-2025 2/2 recovered from the possession of this petitioner is more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases but those cases are of different in nature and the petitioner is on bail in all those cases. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.03.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jehanabad in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T