Patna High CourtL.P.A/1161/2013dismissed

Md. Faizul Hasan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-06Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1161 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2729 of 1990 ====================================================== Md. Faizul Hasan, son of Late Md. Nayeem, resident of village - Mehasul, P.S. - Sitamarhi Town, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna

3. The Additional Collector, Sitamarhi District, Sitamarhi

4. The LRDC, Sitamarhi West, District - Sitamarhi

5. (i) Amna Khatoon Wife of Late Md. Quasim 5(ii) Md. Gufran, son of Late Md. Quasim 5(iii) Md. Mazhar, son of Late Md. Quasim 5(iv) Md. Mustafa Kamal, son of Late Md. Quasim, all residents of village - Mehsaul P. S. - Sitamarhi, District - Sitamarhi 5(v) Halima Khatoon, wife of Md. Zafar, resident of village - Chandanbara, P.S. - Dhaka, District - East Champaran 5(vi) Nasima Khatoon, sife of Hafiz Meraj 5(vii) Barira Khatoon, wife of Zubair, both residents of village - Mehasaul, P.S. - Sitamarhi , Town District - Sitamarhi

6. Md. Irshad Ahmad Son of Late Abdul Late of village - Mehasaul, P.S. - Sitamarhi , Town District - Sitamarhi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Raju Giri Mr. Zaki Haider For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raqhib Ahsan Sr. Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar For the State :

Mr. A.A.G. - 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 06-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

There are concurrent findings of fact by all the three forums. The Learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ

Patna High Court LPA No.1161 of 2013(7) dt.06-11-2017 2/2 application, because pre-emptors are not only co-sharers, but also boundary raiyat. Since the requirements of preemption have been met, therefore, preemption has been rightly allowed. Appeal has no merit, it is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) skm/- U